Monday, July 8, 2013

Why Did He Do It? The Manning-WikiLeaks Defense

from abc






Pfc. Bradley Manning's trial on leaking classified documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks entered the defense phase Monday. As outlined at the start of the trial, his courtroom defense has three major points:
— He was a young, naive soldier who wanted to expose wrongdoing.
— His gender-identity struggles in the "don't ask, don't tell" era made him want to make a difference in the world.
— The leaks did little or no harm to national security.
In his own words, here is what Manning has said on the leaked materials and his case — in a February courtroom statement and his 2010 internet chats with confidant-turned-government-informant Adrian Lamo.
—————
HELICOPTER VIDEO
Manning told the court he was troubled that the military wouldn't release helicopter cockpit video of a 2007 attack in Baghdad that killed 11 men, including a Reuters photographer, his driver and people who tried to help the wounded.
He said joking heard on the video showed "delightful bloodlust" by troops acting like "a child torturing ants with a magnifying glass."
"I wanted the American public to know that not everyone in Iraq and Afghanistan were targets that needed to be neutralized, but rather people who were struggling to live in the 'pressure-cooker' environment of what we call asymmetric warfare."
—————
WAR LOGS
Manning told the court that day-to-day battlefield reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004-09, showed the true nature of the U.S. campaigns there.
"I felt we were risking so much for people that seemed unwilling to cooperate with us, leading to frustration and hatred on both sides," he said.
Manning said that if the American public could read the reports, "this could spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our foreign policy in general."
—————
DETAINEE FILES
In March 2010, Manning sent WikiLeaks a set of threat assessments on Guantanamo Bay detainees.
In early 2009, President Barack Obama "stated he would close (the prison) and that the facility compromised our standing in the world and diminished our 'moral authority,'" Manning told the court. "After familiarizing myself with the (detainee assessments), I agreed."
Manning said the assessments didn't contain names of sources or quotes from interrogation reports and that he determined they "were not very important from either an intelligence or national security standpoint."
—————
DIPLOMATIC CABLES
Manning said that as an intelligence analyst, he read diplomatic cables, and in April 2010 he sent them to WikiLeaks.
"The more I read, the more I was fascinated by the way we dealt with other nations and organizations. I also began to think that they documented backdoor deals and seemingly criminal activity ...
"I thought these cables were a prime example of the need for a more open diplomacy....
"I believed that the public release of these cables would not damage the U.S. However, I did believe the cables might be embarrassing, since they represented very honest opinions and statements behind the backs of other nations and organizations ... a catalog of cliques and gossip."
—————
LIFE AND GENDER ISSUES

No comments:

Post a Comment